Assessment of Awareness on the Risk of Consanguineous Marriages among University Students from Four Developing Countries: A Comparative Study

Main Article Content

Zurki Ibrahim
Nedime Serakinci

Abstract

Marriage between cousins is associated with genetic risks such as birth defects. Here we investigate the level of awareness on the risks associated with consanguineous marriages among University students mainly from, Libya, Jordan, Nigeria and North Cyprus. The comparative study was carried out on 500 students; data were retrieved by using self-administered questionnaire which comprised of socio-demographic characteristics (sex, age, marital status, education, religion) and knowledge of the students towards consanguineous marriage. The data was analyzed by using SPSS, version 18.0 and the Chi-Square test. Participants’ ages were mostly between 20-29 (81%). Majority of the participants from Jordan and Libya have rated the level of consanguineous marriages in their respective countries as high, Nigerians students have rated it as moderate, while students from North Cyprus have rated it as low. Furthermore, 28.4 of the students from Libya, 31.7% of the students from Nigeria, 26.3% Jordan and 13.6% from North Cyprus respectively have expressed poor knowledge about consanguinity. The outcome of this study has demonstrated the need for effective awareness about the deleterious effect of consanguinity in these countries.

Keywords:
Consanguineous marriage, genetic, risks, awareness, defects, attitude.

Article Details

How to Cite
Ibrahim, Z., & Serakinci, N. (2020). Assessment of Awareness on the Risk of Consanguineous Marriages among University Students from Four Developing Countries: A Comparative Study. Asian Journal of Research in Medicine and Medical Science, 2(1), 6-12. Retrieved from https://globalpresshub.com/index.php/AJRMMS/article/view/897
Section
Original Research Article

References

Ghazi O, Pratibha N, Tasneem O, Mahmoud TA, Najib Al, Hanan A. Consanguinity and reproductive health among Arabs. Bio Med Central. 2009;6:17.

Said Bachir, Ammaria Aouar. Study of the impact of consanguinity on abortion and mortality in the population of Beni Abbes (Southwestern Algeria). Egyptian Journal of Medical Human Genetics. 2019;43042-019-0004-7.

Ehlayel M, Bener A, Abu Laban M. Effects of family history and onsanguinity in primar immunodeficiency diseases in children in Qatar. Open J Immunol. 2013;3:47–53.

Fatma R, Sawsan M, Safaa A, Soad A. Knowledge and attitude of students living in Assiut University dorms about consanguinity. Med. Cairo Univ. 2013;81(2).

Hamamy HA, Masri AT, Al-Hadidy AM, Ajlouni KM. Consanguinity and genetic disorders. Profile from Jordan. Saudi Med J. 2007;28:1015-1017.

Bennett RL, Motulsky AG, Bittles A, et al: Genetic counseling and screening of consanguineous couples and their offspring: Recommendations of the National Society of Genetic Counselors. J Genet Counseling. 2002;11:97–119.

Zakzouk S. Consanguinity and hearing impairment in the developing countries: A custom to be discouraged. J Laryngol Otol. 2002;116(10):811-16.

Port KE, Mountain H, Nelson J, Bittles AH. The changing profile of the couples who sought genetic counseling for consanguinity in Australia. Am J Med Genet. 2005;132A(2):159-63.

Al Husain M, Al Bunyan M. Consanguineous marriages in a Saudi population and the effect of inbreeding on the prenatal and the postnatal mortality. Ann Trop Pediatric. 1997;17(2):155-60.

Hamamy H, Antonarakis SE, Cavalli-Sforza LL, et al. Consanguineous marriages, pearls and perils. Geneva International Consanguinity Workshop Report. Genet Med. 2011;13:841–847.

Al-Gazali L, Hamamy H, Al-Arrayad S. Genetic disorders in the Arab world. BMJ. 2006;333:831-834.

Bittles AH, Savithri HS, Murthy G, Baskaran G, Wang W. Consanguinity: A familiar story full of surprises. In: Macbeth H, Shetty P, Eds. Health and Ethnicity. London: Taylor and Francis; 2001.

Jaber L, Romano O, Halpern GJ, Livne I, Green M, Shohat T. Awareness about problems associated with consanguineous marriages: Survey among Israeli Arab adolescents. J Adolescent Health. 2005;36:530.

Movahedian AH, Mosayebi Z, Yousefian S. Congenital anomalies and consanguineous marriages. Kums Journal (FEYZ). 2002;6(3):84-88.

Bittles AH, Mason WM, Greene J, Rao NA. Reproductive behavior and health in consanguineous marriages. Science. 1991;252:789–94.

Kanaan ZM, Mahfouz R, Tamim H. The prevalence of consanguineous marriages in an underserved area in Lebanon and its association with congenital anomalies. Genet Test.

Clark CJ, Hill A, Jabbar K, Silverman JG. Violence during pregnancy in Jordan: Its prevalence and associated risk and protective factors. Violence against Women. 2009;15:720 735.

Al-Gazali LI, Bener A, Abdulrazzaq YM, Micallef R, Al-Khayat AI, Gaber T. Consanguineous marriages in the United Arab Emirates. J Biosoc Sci. 1997;29:491-497.

Abdulrazzaq YM, Bener A, Al-Gazali LI, Al-Khayat AI, Micallef R, Gaber T. A study of possible deleterious effects of consanguinity. Clin Genet. 1997;51:167-173.

Al-Kandari YY, Crews DE. The effect of consanguinity on the congenital disabilities in the Kuwaiti population. J Biosoc Sci. 2011;43:65–73.

Alper OM, Erengin H, Manguolu AE, Bilgen T, Cetin Z, Dedeolu N, et al. Consanguineous marriages in the province of Antalya, Turkey. Ann Genet. 2004;47(2): 129-38.

Bittles AH. Empirical estimates of the global prevalence of consanguineous marriage in contemporary societies. In: Morrison Institute for Population and Resource Studies Working Report 74. Stanford: Stanford University; 1988.

Bell CJ, Dinwiddie DL, Miller NA, et al: Carrier testing for severe childhood recessive diseases by next-generation sequencing. Sci Transl Med. 2011;3:65ra4.

Christianson A, Howson C, Modell B. Global report on birth defects. The Hidden Toll of Dying and Disabled Children. March of Dimes Birth Defects Foundation White Plains, New York; 2006.

Donbak L. Consanguinity in Kahramanmaras city, Turkey and its medical impact. Saudi Med J. 2004;25(12): 1991-94.

Hamamy H, Jamhawi L, Al-Darawsheh J, Ajlouni K. Consanguineous marriages in Jordan: Why is the rate changing with time? Clin Genet. 2005;67:511-516.

Hamamy H. Consanguineous marriages: Preconception consultation in primary health care settings. J Community Genet. 2012;3:185–192.

Hasanzadeh-nazarabadi M, Rezaeetalab GH, Dastfan F. A study on the youths’ knowledge, behavior and attitude towards consanguineous marriages. Iranian J Public Health. 2006;35(3):47-53.

Hussain R, Bittles AH. The prevalence and the demographic characteristics of the consanguineous marriages in Pakistan. J Biosoc Sci. 1998;30:261-75.

Khlat M. Consanguineous marriage and reproduction in Beirut, Lebanon. Am J Hum Genet. 1988;43:188-196.

Khalid Y, Tamim H, Khogali M, Beydoun H, Melki I. Consanguineous marriage and congenital defects: A case control study in the neonatal period. Am. J. Med. Genet. 2010;15.

Khoury SA, Massad DF. Consanguinity, fertility, reproductive wastage, infant mortality and congenital malformations in Jordan. Saudi Med J. 2000;21:150-154.

Khoury MJ, Cohen BH, Chase GA, Diamond EL. An epidemiologic approach to the evaluation of the effect of inbreeding on the pre-reproductive mortality. Am J Epidemiol. 1987;125(2):251-62.

Modell B, Darr A. Science and society: Genetic counseling and customary consanguineous marriage. Nat Rev Genet. 2002;3:225-229.

Mukherjee D, Das S, Banik S. The trends of consanguineous marriages in a Sunni Muslim population of West Bengal, India. Anthropol Anz. 2007;65(3):253-62.

Sedehi M, Keshtkar AA, Golalipour MJ. The knowledge and the attitude of youth couples on/towards consanguineous marriages in the North of Iran. JCDR. 2012;6:1233–1236.

Saify K, Saadat M. Consanguineous marriages in Afghanistan. J Biosoc Sci. 2012;44(1):73-81.

Simek S, Türe M, Tugrul B, Mercan N, Türe H, Akda B. Consanguineous marriages in Denizli, Turkey. Ann Hum Biol. 1999;26(5):489-91.

MA. Consanguinity and deafness in Omani children. Int J Audiol. 2008;47(1):30-33.