Board of Directors’ Characteristics and Corporate Tax Planning: Evidence from Manufacturing and Allied Firms Listed at the Nairobi Securities Exchange, Kenya
Malgit Amos Akims *
Department of Public Policy and Administration, School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Kenyatta University, Nairobi, Kenya.
Kanang Amos Akims
Department of Economics, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Jos, Jos, Nigeria.
*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
The study sought to examine the effect of board of directors’ characteristics on corporate tax planning by Manufacturing and Allied Firms Listed at the Nairobi Securities Exchange, Kenya. Following the explanatory research design, data for the nine (9) manufacturing and allied firms listed at the Nairobi Securities Exchange, Kenya for the period 2010 to 2019 was analyzed based on descriptive and inferential analyses. The results obtained revealed that board independence had significant negative effect p=0.009, β=-0.0037 on the effective tax rate of the manufacturing and allied firms listed at the Nairobi Securities Exchange. On the other hand, both board size and board gender diversity had insignificant negative effect (p=0.783, β=-0.0197, and p=0.146, β=-3.9573 respectively) on the effective tax rate of the manufacturing and allied firms listed at the Nairobi Securities Exchange. Hence, the paper concludes that amongst different board of directors’ characteristics, independence is most important in predicting the corporate tax planning. Specifically, a board of directors with greater independence would ensure better corporate tax planning of firms. The paper therefore recommends that the listed firms should always ensure the constitution of elaborate and balanced boards comprising of both executive and non-executive directors, as this brings about significant improvements in oversight functions of boards and consequently efficient tax planning.
Keywords: Board of directors’ characteristics, board size, board independence, board gender diversity, corporate tax planning
How to Cite
Downloads
References
Aburajab L, Maali B, Jaradat M, Alsharairi M. Board of Directors’ characteristics and tax aggressiveness: evidence from Jordanian listed firms. Theor Econ Lett. 2019;09(7):2732-45. DOI: 10.4236/tel.2019.97171
Ogundajo GO, Onakoya AB. Tax Planning and Financial Performance of Nigerian manufacturing companies. Int J Adv Acad Res Soc Manag Sci. 2016;2(7):64-79.
Osebe PR, Kirui J, K, Naibei I, K. Impact of corporate governance on effective corporate tax rates among listed firms in Kenya. Res J Fin Acc. 2019;10(18):23-33.
Singh S, Tabassum N, Darwish TK, Batsakis G. Corporate governance and Tobin’s Q as a measure of organizational performance. Br J Manag. 2018;29:171-90.
Oyenike O, Olayinka E, Emeni F. Female Directors and Tax Aggressiveness of Listed Banks in Nigeria. 3rd International Conference on African Development Issues (CU-ICADI 2016); 2016.
Minnick K, Noga T. Do corporate governance characteristics influence tax management? J Corp Fin. 2010;16(5): 703-18.
Ilaboya OJ, Izevbekhai MO, Ohiokha FI. Tax planning and firm value: a review of literature. Bus Manag Research. 2016;5(2):81-91.
Kowthar AA. Effect of corporate governance on tax aggressiveness among firms listed in the Nairobi securities exchange (MSc research project, University of Nairobi); 2021.
Zemzem A, Ftouhi K. The effects of Board of Directors’ characteristics on tax aggressiveness. Res J Fin Acc. 2013;4(4):140-9.
Boussaidi A, Hamed MS. The impact of governance mechanisms on tax Aggressiveness: empirical evidence from Tunisian context. J Asian Bus Strategy. 2015;5(1):1-12.
Păunescu RA, Vintilă G, Gherghina ŞC. Exploring the link between corporate governance characteristics and effective corporate tax rate: A panel data approach on U.S. Listed companies. J Financ Stud Res. 2016 (October):1-16. Available:https://doi.org/10.5171/2016.857506
Kang’ara CB. Effect of corporate governance on tax planning of commercial and service firms listed at the Nairobi securities exchange. Masters of science in finance. School Of Business, University of Nairobi; 2019.
Bashiru M, Ba’ba S, Bukar M. The Impact of Corporate Governance Attributes on Tax Planning of listed Nigerian Conglomerate Companies. Int J Acad Res Bus Soc Sci. 2020;10(5):229-38.
Pfeffer J. Size, composition, and function of hospital boards of directors: A study of organizational-environment linkage. Admin Sci Q. 1973;18(3):349-64.
Jensen MC, Meckling WH. Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, AgencyCosts and ownership structure. J Financ Econ. 1976;3(4):305-60.
Martin GP, Wiseman RM, Gomez-Mejia LR. The interactive effect of monitoring and incentive alignment on agency costs. J Manag. 2019;45(2):701-27. Available:https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316678453
Jensen MC. The modern Industrial Revolution, exit and the failure of internal control systems. J Fin. 1993;48(3): 831-80.
Davis JH, Schoorman FD, Donaldson L. Toward a stewardship theory of management. Acad Manag Rev. 1997;22(1):20-47.
Madison KJ. Agency theory and stewardship theory integrated, expanded, and bounded by context: an empirical investigation of Structure, Behavior, and Performance within Family Firms. University of Tennessee; 2014. Available:https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/2711
Zhou Y. Ownership structure, board characteristics, and tax aggressiveness. Hong Kong: Lingnan University; 2011. Available:http://dx.doi.org/10.14793/acct_etd.3
Osamudiame OR, Godwin OO, Imuentinyan EC. Corporate attributes and tax aggressiveness in listed Nigerian companies. J Acc Bus Soc Sci. 2019;2:119-35.
Cooper D, Schindler P. Business research methods. Boston: McGraw-Hill. 2009; 9thed).
Mugenda A, Mugenda O. Research methods: quantitative and qualitative approaches. Nairobi: ACTS Press; 2013.
Field P. Discovering statistics using SPSS. 2nd ed., London, Sage; 2009.